HOW IT ALL STARTED 9000 YEARS AGO
The cross-disciplinary studies on the Beginning of the languages and cultures in Northeast Asia
Recently two pivotal articles were published as for the origins of the
two language families used in the East Asia. In May 2019 the result of inter-disciplinary
study on the origin and dispersal process of Sino-Tibetan language was
published in the PNAS journal while the same subject on the Transeurasian
language family was dealt in a more comprehensive study comprising linguistics,
archaeology and genetics with the result released in Nature in November 2021.
First, the origin and disersal of Sino-Tibetan languages
The Sino-Tibetan language family is spoken by 1.4 billion people in China, Tibet, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal and parts in Pakistan and India, second only to 3.2 billion speakers of Indo-European, but the tracing of its linguistic origin and courses of dispersal has been known a very tough academic task because it comprises all the different types of morphological systems. Grammatically some of the Sino-Tibetan languages have more affinity to the Transeurasian languages than to Chinese. The Chinese is the typical isolating language with the SVO structure, while the Tibetan and Burmese are synthetic with highly inflectional changes sensitive to timing, plurality and respect with the SOV structure, which are the typical features of the Transeurasian languages. The immigrants from Myanmar and Tibet to Korea and Japan find their new language quite familiar and easy to learn, not just for the SOV structure but for the similar application of inflections, including the respectful expressions.
However, the focus of the Max Planck study on the cognates related to agriculture and domestic animals was useful in tracing the origin of the Sino-Tibetan languages to the Northern Chinese communities of foxtail millet farmers of the Neolithic cultures of late Cishan and early Yangshao culture of around 7,200 years ago. The place is where the loess sits on the middle steam of Yellow River. Though the area is known dry and arid due to the low precipitation in our time, at the age around 7,200 BP the area must have been very productive being at the height of the Holocene climate optimum.
ORIGIN AND DISPERSAL OF THE TWO LANGUAGE FAMILIES IN THE EAST ASIA
Now, the origin and dispersal of the Transeurasian language family
“The linguistic relatedness of the Transeurasian
languages—also known as ‘Altaic’—is among the most disputed issues in
linguistic prehistory. Transeurasian denotes a large group of geographically
adjacent languages stretching across Europe and northern Asia, and includes
five uncontroversial linguistic families: Japonic, Koreanic, Tungusic,
Mongolic, and Turkic. The question of whether these five groups descend from a
single common ancestor has been the topic of a long-standing debate between
supporters of inheritance and borrowing. Recent assessments show that even if
many common properties between these languages are indeed due to borrowing,
there is nonetheless a core of reliable evidence for the classification of
Transeurasian as a valid genealogical group.” -excerpt
from the Nature Article
Followings are the important takeaways from the Nature
article released November 10,2021 concerning the origins of Korean and Japanese
people and language:
-The extensive cross-disciplinary study based on the scientific analysis and evidence denies the traditional ‘pastoralist hypothesis’ regarding the Transeurasian language dispersal and supports the agricultural spread of the languages.
-The originator of the proto-Transeurasian language was the neolithic farmers who cultivated broomcorn millet in West Liao basin around 9,000 BP and from this area the languages dispersed to the west through Central Asia up to Anatolia, eastward to Manchuria and to Korean peninsula and to Japan to the east.
Basin separated into
two branches: Korean Chulmun (Comb-pattern) earthenware
Branch and the other
covering the Amur, Primorye and Liaodong, confirming previous
findings about the
dispersal of millet agriculture to Korea by 5500 BP and to the east
Manchuria and
beyond by 5000BP.
-The archeological
analysis further clusters the Bronze Age sites in the West Liao area with
Mumun ( no-pattern
earthenware ) sites in Korea and Yayoi sites in Japan, meaning the
transition from
the neolithic to the Bronze Age took place in the same region where the
proto-Transeurasian
language first originated, separate from the Yellow River region of
the Sino-Tibetan speakers, and by the Bronze Age formed a wide cultural and, possibly,
political sphere, comprising West Liao, Shandong peninsula, Korean Peninsula
and Southern Japan. ( See the Fig.2 of the original article in the Nature )
to continue...

Comments
Post a Comment